Custody, lifecycle and predictive maintenance for every tagged asset
An asset register is only useful if it matches reality. What changes when custody, condition and maintenance are driven by what agents sense in the field, not by manual updates.
Most asset registers start accurate and drift from there. Equipment moves, changes hands and wears down between the moments anyone remembers to update a record — so the system that's meant to be the source of truth quietly stops being true.
Custody that follows the asset
When every asset carries a tag and readers sit where work happens, custody updates itself. A handover, a transfer between sites, a tool leaving a van — each becomes a recorded event at the moment it occurs. The register reflects where things actually are, not where someone last typed that they were.
Lifecycle without the paperwork
The same stream of events builds an asset's history automatically: commissioning, moves, inspections, repairs, retirement. Agents keep that timeline current so audits become a query, not a scramble.
From scheduled to predictive maintenance
Fixed-interval maintenance either wastes effort on healthy equipment or misses failures between visits. Grounded in condition data and usage, agents can propose maintenance when the signals warrant it — and, under human approval, raise the work order, reserve the parts and schedule the visit.
Human approval on the consequential steps
Sensing and proposing happen continuously; the decisions that cost money or take equipment offline stay with your team, each proposal carrying the rationale behind it.